{"id":14571,"date":"2026-03-10T19:15:00","date_gmt":"2026-03-10T19:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/?p=14571"},"modified":"2026-03-10T19:15:00","modified_gmt":"2026-03-10T19:15:00","slug":"dutertes-drug-war-faces-judgement-at-the-icc-rodrigo-duterte","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/?p=14571","title":{"rendered":"Duterte\u2019s drug war faces judgement at the ICC | Rodrigo Duterte"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div><button class=\"article-listen-container\" aria-labelledby=\"listen-text listen-duration\" data-testid=\"listen-to-article-button\"><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"article-listen-container__text\" data-testid=\"listen-to-article-text\">Listen to this article<\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\">\u00a0|\u00a0<\/span><span class=\"article-listen-container__duration\">6 mins<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/button><button tabindex=\"0\" class=\"tooltip-accessible_trigger\"><svg class=\"icon icon--info icon--main-grey-dark icon--16 listen-to-article-tooltip__icon\" viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.1\" aria-hidden=\"true\" role=\"presentation\"><title>info<\/title><path class=\"icon-main-color\" d=\"M12 0a12 12 0 1 0 0 24 12 12 0 0 0 0-24Zm-.226 3.225a2.039 2.039 0 0 1 2.155 1.924v.193a1.998 1.998 0 0 1-2.155 2.149 2.029 2.029 0 0 1-2.146-2.15 2.039 2.039 0 0 1 1.955-2.122h.193l-.002.006Zm3.227 15.525a.75.75 0 0 1-.752.75H9.75a.75.75 0 0 1-.75-.75v-1.5a.75.75 0 0 1 .752-.75h.748V12h-.75a.75.75 0 0 1-.75-.75v-1.5a.75.75 0 0 1 .752-.751h3a.75.75 0 0 1 .75.752v6.75h.75a.75.75 0 0 1 .75.749L15 18.75Z\"\/><\/svg><\/button><\/div>\n<div aria-live=\"polite\" aria-atomic=\"true\">\n<p>As world institutions wobble, The Hague has unexpectedly become the stage for a reckoning long denied in the Philippines.<\/p>\n<p>Proceedings at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in late February offered a rare glimpse of accountability at a moment when global norms feel increasingly fragile. The court held a hearing in the case against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte to confirm charges for crimes against humanity committed during the so\u2011called \u201cwar on drugs\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>For the families of those killed in the \u201cdrug war\u201d watching tearfully from the public gallery, this hearing marked the first real step towards justice after years of violence, denial, and dehumanisation of their loved ones. As a Filipino lawyer and counsel for the victims, Joel Butuyan, told the court, \u201cTruth is the antidote to the virus of impunity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A three-judge panel \u2013 women from Romania, Mexico and Benin \u2013 heard arguments from prosecutors, victims\u2019 counsel, and Duterte\u2019s defence lawyer. Their task was not to determine guilt, but to assess whether there is sufficient evidence for the case against Duterte to proceed to trial.<\/p>\n<p>The case focuses on 49 incidents of alleged murder and attempted murder, involving 78 victims, including children, between November 2011 and March 2019, when the ICC still had jurisdiction over the Philippines. In March 2018, soon after the former ICC prosecutor announced a preliminary inquiry into the situation of the Philippines, Duterte withdrew the Philippines from the court\u2019s membership, which became final one year later.<\/p>\n<p>The case against Duterte covers his tenure as mayor of Davao City, in the southern Philippines, and the period after he was elected president in 2016. The prosecutors emphasised that the specific incidents they focused on represent only a fraction of the thousands of killings attributed to police and hired hitmen during Duterte\u2019s anti-drug campaign.<\/p>\n<p>I sat in the public gallery alongside victims\u2019 families, activists, clergy, journalists, and lawyers who had traveled from the Philippines to witness a moment many never thought possible. Duterte\u2019s supporters were there, too. But Duterte himself was absent as he waived his right to be present. His written statement declared that he did not recognize the court\u2019s jurisdiction and claimed he had been \u201ckidnapped\u201d. His refusal to appear was obviously a disappointment for the victims\u2019 families, hoping to see him in the dock.<\/p>\n<p>Still, his voice echoed through the courtroom. Prosecutors played video after video of Duterte urging police to kill drug suspects and ignore legal restraints. In one chilling 2016 address, he warned: \u201cIf I become the president, I will order the military and the police to hunt down the drug lords, the big ones, and kill them.\u201d\u00a0 Duterte\u2019s lawyer argued that the prosecutors were selective in their approach to the speeches and that they missed critical information that would exonerate Duterte, including references to using force in self-defence.<\/p>\n<p>Human Rights Watch has been reporting on Duterte\u2019s \u201cdrug wars\u201d since 2009, when we detailed the operations of the \u201cDavao Death Squad\u201d that targeted street children, petty criminals and drug suspects when Duterte was mayor. A 2017 Human Rights Watch <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hrw.org\/report\/2017\/03\/02\/license-kill\/philippine-police-killings-dutertes-war-drugs\">report<\/a>\u00a0showed how Duterte\u2019s \u201cdrug war\u201d escalated nationwide after he was elected president.<\/p>\n<p>The panel now has 60 days to decide whether the case will proceed to trial. But while the ICC deliberates, drug-related killings in the Philippines continue, though reduced from their peak during the Duterte administration.<\/p>\n<p>Domestic accountability remains woefully inadequate. Nearly 10 years after the nationwide \u201cdrug war\u201d began, five cases have resulted in convictions of a total of nine police officers. The vast majority of those responsible, including senior officials, remain untouched.<\/p>\n<p>The political context is also fraught. Sending Duterte to The Hague may have suited the current president, Ferdinand Marcos Jr,\u00a0 allowing him to distance himself from the bloodiest excesses of his predecessor. But several of Duterte\u2019s alleged co\u2011perpetrators \u2013 senior police officers and officials who helped transplant Davao City\u2019s \u201cneutralisation\u201d strategies to the national stage \u2013 still wield influence or have gone into hiding.<\/p>\n<p>The security architecture that enabled the killings within the national police force remains largely intact. With the wrong political signal, the violence could easily surge again.<\/p>\n<p>Marcos now faces a defining choice. He can continue outsourcing justice to the ICC while tolerating a culture of impunity at home. Or he can demonstrate genuine commitment to accountability and the rule of law. Doing so would require a clear, public repudiation of the decade-long police operation underpinning the anti-drug campaign, and an explicit assurance that its methods are no longer acceptable state policy.<\/p>\n<p>Marcos should also empower the Department of Justice to pursue investigations and prosecutions in earnest, and take steps to rejoin the ICC, which would, in turn, help strengthen domestic accountability efforts. Without credible domestic action, promises of reform will ring hollow.<\/p>\n<p>This is a moment of reckoning for the Philippines. Families who have waited years for answers deserve more than political convenience; they deserve justice. Whatever the ICC decides in the coming months, the Philippine government need not \u2013 and should not \u2013 wait. Ending impunity and honouring the dignity of victims begins at home.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>The views expressed in this article are the author\u2019s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera\u2019s editorial stance.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Listen to this article\u00a0|\u00a06 mins info As world institutions wobble, The Hague has unexpectedly become the stage for a reckoning long denied in the Philippines. Proceedings at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in late February offered a rare glimpse of accountability at a moment when global norms feel increasingly fragile. The court held a hearing [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":14572,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14571","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-opinion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14571","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14571"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14571\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/14572"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14571"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14571"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14571"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}