The Panama Canal has emerged as the latest maritime flashpoint, with the United States and China exchanging barbs in recent weeks over influence in what is one of the world\u2019s most important shipping routes.<\/p>\n
Earlier this week, Washington and its allies in the region accused Beijing of detaining and holding up Panama-linked ships \u2013 and claimed China\u2019s actions were a \u201cblatant attempt to politicise maritime trade\u201d.<\/p>\n list of 4 items<\/span>end of list<\/span><\/section>\n On Wednesday, China strongly denied the allegations, calling them \u201chypocritical\u201d and accusing the US of politicising global commerce and undermining sovereignty.<\/p>\n Analysts have warned that any disruption to the canal, even temporarily, could \u201cdisrupt global trade significantly\u201d. \u201cIt would lead to temporary supply bottlenecks, stock market volatility, inflationary upward pressure and could dampen global GDP measurably if prolonged,\u201d Ferdinand Rauch, a professor of economics at the University of St Gallen in Switzerland, told Al Jazeera.<\/p>\n This latest standoff comes as tensions between the US and Iran continue to foment over another key waterway, the Strait of Hormuz, which has been in effect closed for weeks since the launch of US-Israeli attacks on Iran, and which has been the site of multiple attacks and seizures of ships during that time.<\/p>\n Together, these frictions point to a broader shift in international shipping, demonstrating that major powers are increasingly willing to contest control of global shipping lanes, raising questions over whether longstanding international laws governing the world\u2019s seas are beginning to unravel.<\/p>\n So, what is the latest dispute over the Panama Canal all about, and what does it mean for the future of maritime law and safety?<\/p>\n In a joint statement on Tuesday with Bolivia, Costa Rica, Guyana, Paraguay, Trinidad and Tobago, the US condemned what it called \u201cChina\u2019s targeted economic pressure\u201d and actions that have \u201caffected Panama\u2011flagged vessels\u201d.<\/p>\n The countries accused China of detaining Panama-flagged ships in its own ports and said these actions are \u201ca blatant attempt to politicise maritime trade and infringe on the sovereignty of the nations of our hemisphere\u201d.<\/p>\n Calling Panama \u201ca pillar of our maritime trading system\u201d that must remain \u201cfree from any undue external pressure\u201d, they warned that \u201cany attempts to undermine Panama\u2019s sovereignty are a threat to us all\u201d and pledged to keep the Americas \u201ca region of freedom, security, and prosperity\u201d.<\/p>\n China appears to be denying that it has detained Panama-flagged ships. Addressing the crisis on Wednesday, Lin Jian, a spokesperson for China\u2019s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said the US accusations \u201care completely unfounded and distort reality\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cWho occupied the Panama Canal for a long time, invaded Panama with its military, and arbitrarily trampled on its sovereignty and dignity? Who covets the Panama Canal, seeks to turn this international waterway \u2013 meant to remain permanently neutral \u2013 into its own territory, and disregards the sovereignty of regional countries? The answer is self-evident,\u201d Jian told a news conference. \u201cThe one who has politicised and securitised the issue of ports is the United States.\u201d<\/p>\n On Wednesday, Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulino said in a statement that he welcomed the \u201csolidarity of friendly countries\u201d regarding the Panamanian-flagged ships held in Chinese ports, while appearing to try to ease tensions.<\/p>\n \u201cWe do not wish to engage in controversy, as we value respectful relations with all nations,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n In January, Panama\u2019s Supreme Court scrapped a longstanding concession held by a Hong Kong-linked company to operate the Balboa and Cristobal ports.<\/p>\n That decision came amid sustained US pressure on Panama to curb Chinese influence around the canal.<\/p>\n US President Donald Trump has suggested multiple times since his second term began that the US could take control of the Panama Canal, while accusing China, without evidence, of managing the strategic waterway, which accounts for about six percent of global trade.<\/p>\n China slammed the Panama court\u2019s ruling, saying that Panama had \u201cwillingly succumbed\u201d to hegemonic power. In the weeks since, Beijing has been accused by Washington of detaining or delaying dozens of Panama-flagged ships.<\/p>\n According to the US Federal Maritime Commission, there has been \u201ca surge in detentions\u201d of Panama\u2011flagged vessels, \u201cfar exceeding historical norms\u201d since the court\u2019s ruling, it said last month.<\/p>\n US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described China\u2019s alleged actions as \u201cbullying\u201d, saying they raised \u201cserious concerns\u201d about using economic leverage to undermine Panama\u2019s \u201csovereignty\u201d. Beijing has denied the charges, calling them \u201cgroundless\u201d.<\/p>\n What makes the Panama Canal dispute more heightened is the fact that it is unfolding alongside a wider erosion of maritime norms, most notably in the Strait of Hormuz.<\/p>\n The tensions there have caused major disruption to global energy markets since the US and Israel started bombing Iran on February 28. Tehran responded by effectively closing the strait, through which one-fifth of the world\u2019s oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies are shipped during peacetime, causing oil prices to soar. Later, Iran began charging tolls for passage through \u2013 a move until now unheard of for a strait.<\/p>\n Despite a fragile ceasefire, Washington, in an attempt to pressure Iran, has imposed a naval blockade targeting Iranian shipping and ports.<\/p>\n Currently, some 2,000 vessels are stranded at either end of the strait, while others have been rerouted, come under fire or even been seized in the strait and the open sea. Last week, Iran captured two foreign container ships attempting to traverse the Hormuz strait, while firing at a third one.<\/p>\n Two days earlier, the US military seized the Iranian container ship Touska close to the Gulf, claiming it was attempting to cross the Arabian Sea through the Strait of Hormuz and was heading towards the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas.<\/p>\n Abdul Khalique, a professor at Liverpool John Moores University in the UK, said \u201crising geopolitical rivalry\u201d is increasingly \u201cspilling into maritime chokepoints, from the Panama Canal to the Strait of Hormuz\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cWhile not yet a permanent \u2018new normal\u2019, the pattern of coercive signalling, accusations, and counter-accusations suggests higher baseline risk, politicised shipping lanes, and more frequent disruptions to commercial flows and insurance markets globally,\u201d Khalique told Al Jazeera.<\/p>\n James Kraska, Charles H Stockton Chair of International Law at the US Naval War College, told Al Jazeera, however, that the ongoing maritime crisis between the US and Iran, is unlikely to become a permanent feature of global shipping.<\/p>\n \u201cMy personal view is that the straits will be open through some sort of negotiated agreement between Iran and the United States,\u201d Kraska said. \u201cAnd so I believe and hope that this does not become a new normal in the Strait of Hormuz.\u201d<\/p>\n Kraska said strong international opposition to the unilateral closure of major sea lanes will be a key factor driving a resolution, \u201cregardless of the tension or conflict between the United States and Iran\u201d.<\/p>\n This will come because of the spike in global energy costs, which [has] \u201cgalvanised attention toward this issue\u201d, Kraska said.<\/p>\n Other waterways such as the Panama Canal, he said, operate under \u201ccompletely different legal regimes\u201d from straits, and are already allowed to charge fees for \u201cservices provided to maintain the infrastructure\u201d.<\/p>\n It will be notable to see whether other coastal states try to copy Iran by extracting payments for passage through natural straits, Kraska said, adding that some commentators point to Denmark in the Baltic Sea as a hypothetical example.<\/p>\n \u201cHere again, I am optimistic,\u201d he said. \u00a0\u201cI believe that states understand their position in the world\u2026 in terms of legitimacy \u2026. is going to be enhanced by adhering to the rule of law and the law of the sea rather than trying to impose unilateral gatekeeping\u201d.<\/p>\n Khalique, however, said there are signs that governments and firms are \u201calready adapting pragmatically: diversifying supply chains, revising risk premiums, increasing naval coordination, and investing in alternative routes\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cWhile not formally labelled a \u2018new normal\u2019 operational behaviour increasingly reflects expectations of sustained geopolitical volatility in maritime trade,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n UPF Barcelona School of Management professor Stephan Maurer said the consequences of disruption to or even closure of the Panama Canal for global trade \u201ccould be very grave, depending on the degree of disruption\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cMost of the trade flows going through the canal are between the US East Coast and Asia, but South American intercoastal trade, trade between the US East and the West of South America, and between Europe and the West Coast of South America would also be affected,\u201d he told Al Jazeera.<\/p>\n \u201cTrade would adapt, but for these trade routes, alternatives would greatly increase distances to be covered (eg, going around the southern tip of South America),\u201d Maurer added, noting that while South American countries would be most impacted, the US and Canada would also be \u201cseverely affected\u201d.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The Panama Canal has emerged as the latest maritime flashpoint, with the United States and China exchanging barbs in recent weeks over influence in what is one of the world\u2019s most important shipping routes. Earlier this week, Washington and its allies in the region accused Beijing of detaining and holding up Panama-linked ships \u2013 and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":20970,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20969","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-latin-america-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20969","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20969"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20969\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/20970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20969"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20969"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Recommended Stories <\/h2>\n
What is happening in the Panama Canal?<\/h2>\n
What led to this crisis?<\/h2>\n
![\"Interactive_Panama_Canal_December23_2024\"](\"https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Interactive_Panama_Canal-1734956802.jpg?w=770&resize=770%2C962&quality=80\")
<\/p>\nWhat other maritime crises are happening now?<\/h2>\n
Is all this the \u2018new normal\u2019 for global shipping?<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"