\n<\/p>\n
United States President Donald Trump\u2019s second administration has introduced a bold and unconventional strategy for the Middle East. The administration intends to recalibrate US influence in a region historically scarred by conflict, prioritising regional stability through economic strength and military consolidation by asserting a stronger, business-minded US presence.<\/p>\n
At the centre of Trump\u2019s ambitious goal is what the new US envoy to Iraq, Mark Savaya, described as his goal to \u201cmake Iraq great again\u201d. This approach moves away from traditional endless war tactics towards a transactional, results-oriented diplomacy that aims to restore Iraqi sovereignty and economic vitality. It could be the \u201cgreat gamble\u201d for Trump, who seeks an Iraq that serves as a stable, sovereign regional hub rather than a battleground for foreign interests.<\/p>\n
Trump\u2019s primary plans and wishes for Iraq involve a twofold mission: consolidating all armed forces under the command of the legitimate state and drastically reducing the influence of malign foreign players, most notably Iran. The administration seeks to open Iraqi markets to international investment, upgrade the country\u2019s infrastructure, and secure the independence of its energy sector. Hence, the plan is to ground a genuine partnership that respects Iraq\u2019s unity while ensuring that it is no longer a central node for militia activity or external interference.<\/p>\n
This assertive US strategy lands directly in a highly contested and fractured political environment in Iraq, which is less a single state than a patchwork of competing powers. The heart of the problem lies not just in parliament, but also in the persistent shadow influence of armed factions and militias that often operate outside the formal chain of state command. Those groups were among the biggest winners in the November 2025 elections.<\/p>\n
Now the ongoing government negotiations have thrown a stark light on these non-state actors.<\/p>\n
Their power raises crucial concerns for the future: How can Iraq enforce the law and, crucially, attract the foreign investment needed for revival if armed groups challenge state authority? The consolidation of the country\u2019s armed forces under complete state control is an urgent necessity, underscored by rising regional tensions and security threats.<\/p>\n
Moreover, the path to achieving genuine stability is severely obstructed by entrenched political interests.<\/p>\n
For Iraq to achieve stability, it must urgently strengthen its institutional frameworks and clearly establish a separation of powers. Yet, many political parties seem more focused on maintaining control over lucrative state resources than on implementing the meaningful reforms the country desperately needs. The result is a governance model struggling to stand firm amid the crosscurrents of competing loyalties and power grabs.<\/p>\n
To achieve these high-stakes goals, Trump has bypassed traditional diplomatic channels by appointing Mark Savaya as the US special envoy to Iraq on October 19. Such an appointment signals a shift towards \u201cdeal-making\u201d diplomacy. Savaya\u2019s mission is to navigate the complex political turmoil following Iraq\u2019s parliamentary elections to steer the country towards a stable transition. His job is to bridge the gap between institutional support and massive financial investment, acting as a direct representative of Trump\u2019s business-centric foreign policy.<\/p>\n
Savaya is an Iraqi-born, Detroit-based businessman lacking the traditional diplomatic background; his experience is rooted in the private sector in the cannabis industry, but he gained political prominence as an active supporter of Trump\u2019s campaign in Michigan.<\/p>\n
He played a key role in the delicate negotiations that secured the release of Elizabeth Tsurkov, the Israeli-Russian academic and Princeton University student who had been kidnapped by an Iraqi militia for more than two years.<\/p>\n
Savaya\u2019s communal and ethnic ties have given him significant access to Iraqi power centres that traditional diplomats often lack.<\/p>\n
Iraq\u2019s position in a geopolitical tug-of-war is compounding the internal struggles, forced to balance its critical relationships with two giants: the US and Iran. On the one hand, Washington\u2019s objective is clear: it wants to bolster Iraq\u2019s sovereignty while simultaneously pushing back against the dominance of powerful, often Iran-backed, militias. The US believes that allowing these armed groups too much sway could leave the nation isolated and wreck its fragile economic stability.<\/p>\n
But Iranian influence remains a formidable and enduring force. Tehran views Iraq not just as a neighbour but also as a crucial strategic ally for projecting its power across the entire region. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has been actively working to maintain unity among key Shia factions in Baghdad. This move clearly signals Iran\u2019s deep and enduring interest in shaping Iraq\u2019s political alignment and its future path. Iraq must therefore navigate this high-stakes balancing act to survive.<\/p>\n
Savaya\u2019s mission unfolds at a time when Iran\u2019s regional \u201caxis of resistance\u201d is under unprecedented pressure. Having already lost their primary foothold in Syria after the fall of the Assad regime in late 2024, and seeing Hezbollah\u2019s political and military standing in Lebanon severely decimated by the 2025 conflict with Israel, Iranian proxies now face the very real prospect of losing their grip on Iraq too.<\/p>\n
In Lebanon, a new government is committed to regaining the state\u2019s monopoly on the use of force, leaving Hezbollah increasingly isolated. This regional retreat means that for Tehran, maintaining influence in Baghdad is a final, desperate stand to remain a relevant regional power.<\/p>\n
The success of Trump\u2019s gamble also depends on the roles of other regional players. Turkiye has recently recalibrated its strategy to integrate Iraq into ad hoc regional trade and security frameworks, effectively diluting Iran\u2019s centrality. Simultaneously, Gulf monarchies such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are emerging as key economic and security partners for Baghdad, offering an alternative to reliance on Iran.<\/p>\n
However, these regional actors also bring their own agendas \u2014 such as Turkiye\u2019s focus on containing Kurdish movements \u2014 which may conflict with US objectives. If Savaya can successfully align these diverse regional interests with Trump\u2019s plan, he may fundamentally rewrite Iraq\u2019s turbulent future.<\/p>\n
The \u201cMake Iraq Great Again\u201d strategy reflects a pragmatic reassertion of US interests within the anarchic international system, prioritising Washington\u2019s security and economic power over idealistic goals.<\/p>\n
By appointing Savaya \u2014 an unconventional, business-oriented envoy \u2014 the Trump administration is employing \u201ctransactional realism\u201d, utilising economic diplomacy and personal ties as strategic tools to pull Iraq away from Iran\u2019s orbit. This approach views the US-Iran rivalry as a zero-sum game of power politics, where integrating Iraq\u2019s armed forces under centralised state control is fundamental to restoring a state-centric order and sidelining non-state militias that currently feed Tehran\u2019s regional influence.<\/p>\n
The new US envoy to Iraq has made clear that \u201cthere is no place for armed groups in a fully sovereign Iraq\u201d. His calls resonated with Iraqi officials and militia leaders alike \u2013 now at least three militias close to Iran have publicly agreed to disarm. However, other groups have yet to do the same, while rejecting the call from the outset.<\/p>\n
However, this high-stakes attempt to shift the regional balance of power faces a significant \u201csecurity dilemma\u201d, as aggressive moves to diminish Iranian influence may trigger a violent defensive response from Tehran to protect its remaining strategic assets. While the strategy seeks to exploit a regional shift \u2013 leveraging the weakened state of Iranian proxies in Syria and Lebanon \u2013 it must contend with the \u201chybrid\u201d power of Iraqi militias and the narrow self-interests of neighbouring players like Turkiye and the Gulf states.<\/p>\n
The success of this gamble depends on whether the US can dismantle the shadow economies that facilitate foreign interference and establish a stable, autonomous Iraqi state capable of navigating the intense geopolitical tug-of-war between Washington and Tehran.<\/p>\n
Ultimately, the appointment of Savaya serves as the definitive stress test for Iraqi sovereignty, marking a high-stakes transition towards a transactional \u201cAmerica First\u201d strategy aimed at \u201cMaking Iraq Great Again\u201d. By attempting to consolidate military command under the state and dismantle the shadow economies fuelling Iranian influence, Savaya\u2019s mission seeks to exploit the current regional weakening of Tehran\u2019s proxies to transform Iraq into a stable, autonomous hub.<\/p>\n
However, the success of this \u201cGreat Gamble\u201d hinges on Savaya\u2019s ability to overcome entrenched political opposition and reconcile the presence of US forces with the demand for national unity. If this unconventional diplomatic push can bridge internal divides \u2014 particularly between Baghdad and the semi-autonomous Kurdish region in the north \u2014 Iraq may finally secure a path towards economic independence; otherwise, the nation risks remaining a perpetual battleground caught in the geopolitical crossfire between Washington and Tehran.<\/p>\n
The views expressed in this article are the author\u2019s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera\u2019s editorial stance.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n United States President Donald Trump\u2019s second administration has introduced a bold and unconventional strategy for the Middle East. The administration intends to recalibrate US influence in a region historically scarred by conflict, prioritising regional stability through economic strength and military consolidation by asserting a stronger, business-minded US presence. At the centre of Trump\u2019s ambitious goal […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6199,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-middle-east-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6198"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6198\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/6199"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inernews.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"